I’m sure most of us have been touched by some of the news stories over the last few days. The death of Michael Jackson has provoked a worldwide reaction and a reaction that many of us may not have expected, in that it has been so positive in remembering him for his talent. You may have seen one of the documentaries about Michael that ended with the words;
“How Michael Jackson will be remembered will depend on who tells the story”.
This got me thinking about how we construct our reality of events through discussion, negotiation and discourse.
Another item of news that you may have seen was the description of the initial phase of demonstrations against the presidential election results in Iran. The BBC’s correspondent, Jeremy Bowen, described how there were “two narratives” vying for supremacy through discourse. The official governmental line was that ‘the elections were fair and democratic and the demonstrators were terrorists’. The narrative from the demonstrators was that ‘the elections were rigged and they were fighting for the good of the country, to ensure Iran became a modern state free from the tyranny of a dictatorship’. Bowen suggested that, through debate, people were constructing their polarised versions of reality based on the narratives being proposed.
Gail Fairhurst, in her book ‘Discursive Leadership’, suggests that leadership is also constructed and negotiated. Her favourite definition of leadership is that;
“Leadership is exercised when ideas expressed in talk or actions are recognised by others as capable of progressing tasks or problems that are important to them”.
Fairhurst suggests that this definition takes some thinking about. Firstly, she says, it acknowledges that leadership is a process of influence and meaning-making between people. She goes on to argue that, therefore,
i) anyone can be a leader,
ii) leadership is a process, not just about one way communication.
and iii) leadership is an attribution made by followers or observers. (Just because you have the title does not mean you are accepted as a leader.)
All of which raises some though provoking questions for us as individuals and leaders.
•Are we aware that our words, our discourses and actions are constantly being evaluated by others?
•Are we aware of how we come across to others?
•Are we aware of the way we make attributions?
•Do we actively seek feedback to increase our self awareness?
Food for thought?
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
Michael Jackson was a really great entertainer. I like his lyrics and the way he tries to influent the listener. He is the only one and i thin people won’t forget him the next 500 years!
Greetings to all of you
I want to thank the blogger very much not only for this post but also for his all previous efforts. I found http://www.iridiumconsulting.co.uk to be very interesting. I will be coming back to http://www.iridiumconsulting.co.uk for more information.
Hey, Good blog you have here. I wanted to let you all know that I think Twitter is going to be one of the stronger networks because of the fact that it is supported by so many industries. I also think when Twitter introduces some of it’s new features, returning traffic will increase to show the real growth of the network.
Anyway, I build a website that gives away great resources for Twitter that are 100% free, so come and visit and don’t be a stranger.
Keep up the great work!
This post is beyond awesome. I am always wondering what to do and what not to do so I will follow some of these tips.
Good fill someone in on and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you seeking your information.
Nice blog at http://www.iridiumconsulting.co.uk. Michael Jackson was a great pop star. I just read that the Texas Medical Board has restricted the doctor charged in Michael Jackson’s death from administering the drug authorities say was responsible for killing the pop star.
Thank you for the great post – I had fun reading it! I always enjoy this blog.